Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry di Era Merdeka Belajar: Efektivitas Projek Sains IPA Siswa di Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56630/mes.v2i2.209Keywords:
Guided Inquiry Learning; Merdeka Belajar; Science Project Learning; Elementary SchoolAbstract
Every learning activity that uses a model allows learning interactions between teachers and students, as well as between students and other students. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of elementary school students' science learning projects in the Merdeka Belajar era through the implementation of guided inquiry learning. The research method is Quasi Experimental Design which does not require the sample to be randomly selected (random). This study involved all students at SD Negeri Kabinuang, with a sample of class V selected through a purposive mechanism. Written test instruments, direct observation, and documentation were used to collect data. Analyzed inferentially by using the results of processed statistical data. The results showed that the question-directed learning model is very effective in carrying out science projects in the Merdeka Belajar era. These results can be generalized in a broader context. The guided inquiry model is proven to be effective and appropriate to be applied in science learning based on science projects in elementary schools when used for science project activities that are in accordance with the desired learning concepts in the Merdeka Curriculum in elementary schools.
References
Aditya, B. R., Andrisyah, Ismiatun, A. N., Atika, A. R., & Permadi, A. (2021). Digital disruption in early childhood education: A qualitative research from teachers’ perspective. Procedia Computer Science, 197(2021), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.169
Alfarraj, Y. F., Aldahmash, A. H., & Omar, S. H. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on teaching science through an argumentation-driven inquiry model: A mixed-methods study. Heliyon, 9(9), e19739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19739
Alrashed, Y., & Bin, I. A. (2021). Flipped Learning in Science Education: Implications and Challenges. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(1), 5697–5707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i1.1973
Atuhurra, J., & Kaffenberger, M. (2022). Measuring education system coherence: Alignment of curriculum standards, examinations, and teacher instruction in Tanzania and Uganda. International Journal of Educational Development, 92(May), 102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102598
Barongan, T., Neikirk, K., Shao, B., Vue, N., Spencer, E. C., Kabugi, K., Conley, Z., Vang, L., Vue, M., Vang, N., Garza-Lopez, E., Crabtree, A., Alexander, S., Dal, A., Beasley, H. K., Marshall, A. G., Killion, M., Stephens, D. C., Martinez, D., … Hinton, A. (2023). Project Strengthen: An STEMM-focused career development workshop to prepare underrepresented minority students for graduate school. IScience, 26(10), 107766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107766
Bayley, S. H. (2022). Learning for adaptation and 21st-century skills: Evidence of pupils’ flexibility in Rwandan primary schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 93(July), 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102642
Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(January), 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068
Bray, D. A., Girvan, D. C., & Chorcora, E. N. (2023). Students’ perceptions of pedagogy for 21st century learning instrument (S-POP-21): Concept, validation, and initial results. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49(May 2022), 101319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101319
Cholilah, M., Tatuwo, A. G. P., Komariah, Rosdiana, S. P., & Noor, A. F. (2023). Pengembangan kurikulum merdeka dalam satuan pendidikan serta implementasi kurikulum merdeka pada pembelajaran abad 21. Sanskara Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 1(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.58812/spp.v1.i02
de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Let’s talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Educational Research Review, 39(May), 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536
Demissie, E. B., Labiso, T. O., & Thuo, M. W. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies and technology integration in education: Insights from secondary schools in Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 6(1), 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100355
Dereli, D. D. (2015). Innovation management in global competition and competitive advantage. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1365–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.323
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2021). Learning from reviewing peers’ concept maps in an inquiry context: Commenting or grading, which is better? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68(December 2020), 100959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100959
Donkoh, R., On, W., Thomas, A., Donkor, J., Twerefoo, O., Kudwo, M., & Yeboah, S. (2023). Heliyon Effects of educational management on quality education in rural and urban primary schools in Ghana. Heliyon, 9(11), e21325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21325
Droubi, S., Galamba, A., Fernandes, F. L., de Mendonça, A. A., & Heffron, R. J. (2023). Transforming education for the just transition. Energy Research and Social Science, 100(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103090
Ergül, N. R., & Keskin, E. (2014). The effect of project based learning on students ’ science success. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 537–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.371
Foroushani, Z. J.-A., Mahini, F., & Yousefy, A. R. (2012). Moral education as learner’s need in 21 century: Kant ideas on education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.646
Gillies, R. M. (2023). International Journal of Educational Research Open Dialogic teaching in a Year 5 classroom during cooperative inquiry-based science. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5(September), 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100290
Gumilar, R. P., & Wardani, S. (2020). The implementation of guided inquiry learning models on the concept mastery, scientific attitude, and science process skill. In Journal of Primary Education (Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 148-`154). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v9i2.29256
Guraziu, E., & Gobbo, G. Del. (2023). An emerging qualitative study on project management as a bridge between cognitive learning and employability. Procedia Computer Science, 219(2021), 1954–1962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.495
Haug, B. S., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Taking 21st century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103286
Hazra, D., & Aranzazu, J. (2022). Crime, correction, education and welfare in the U.S. – What role does the government play? Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(2), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.03.007
Huizinga, T., Lohuis, A., Zwerver-Bergman, J., & van der Meer, R. (2022). Student and teacher perceptions of community of inquiry in hybrid virtual classrooms. Heliyon, 8(12), e12549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12549
Jääskä, E., Lehtinen, J., Kujala, J., & Kauppila, O. (2022). Game-based learning and students’ motivation in project management education. Project Leadership and Society, 3(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100055
Jansson, M., Hrastinski, S., Stenbom, S., & Enoksson, F. (2021). Online question and answer sessions: How students support their own and other students’ processes of inquiry in a text-based learning environment. Internet and Higher Education, 51(December 2020), 100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100817
Jiang, Y., Clarke-Midura, J., Keller, B., Baker, R. S., Paquette, L., & Ocumpaugh, J. (2018). Note-taking and science inquiry in an open-ended learning environment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55(August), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.08.004
Jufriadi, A., Huda, C., Aji, S. D., Pratiwi, H. Y., & Ayu, H. D. (2022). Analisis keterampilan abad 21 melalui implementasi kurikulum merdeka belajar kampus merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 7(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v7i1.2482
Juraidah, & Hartoyo, A. (2022). Peran guru dalam menumbuhkembangkan kemandirian belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar melalui proyek penguatan profil pelajar Pancasila. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Perkhasa Http://Jurnal.Stkippersada.Ac.Id/Jurnal/Index.Php/JPDP/, 8(2), 105–118. http://jurnal.stkippersada.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/JPDP/
Kaczkó, É., & Ostendorf, A. (2023). Critical thinking in the community of inquiry framework: An analysis of the theoretical model and cognitive presence coding schemes. Computers and Education, 193(November 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104662
Kori, K., Mäeots, M., & Pedaste, M. (2014). Guided Reflection to Support Quality of Reflection and Inquiry in Web-based Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112(Iceepsy 2013), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1161
Lan, G., Zhao, X., & Gong, M. (2023). Motivational intensity and willingness to communicate in L2 learning: A moderated mediation model of enjoyment, boredom, and shyness. System, 117(March), 103116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103116
Li, L., Zhang, R., & Piper, A. M. (2023). Predictors of student engagement and perceived learning in emergency online education amidst COVID-19: A community of inquiry perspective. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12(August), 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100326
Marasabesy, A., Jusuf, R., Pamuti, & Wahid, S. M. J. (2023). Improving students’ cience process skills on the concept of science in elementary school through the guided inquiry learning model. 7(2), 2139–2147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.6437
Margunayasa, I. G., Dantes, N., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suastra, I. W. (2019). The effect of guided inquiry learning and cognitive style on science learning achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12147a
Marnewick, C. (2023). Student experiences of project-based learning in agile project management education. Project Leadership and Society, 4(August), 100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100096
Nkaizirwa, J. P., Aurah, C. M., & Nsanganwimana, F. (2023). Data collected to assess the effect of inquiry-based learning on environmental knowledge and attitudes among pre-service biology teachers in Tanzania. Data in Brief, 49, 109429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109429
Nzomo, C., Rugano, P., Njoroge Mungai, J., & Gitonga Muriithi, C. (2023). Inquiry-based learning and students’ self-efficacy in Chemistry among secondary schools in Kenya. Heliyon, 9(1), e12672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12672
Osman, K., Tuan Soh, T. M., & Arsad, N. M. (2010). Development and validation of the Malaysian 21st century skills instrument (M-21CSI) for science students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 599–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.204
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Radu, I., Huang, X., Kestin, G., & Schneider, B. (2023). How augmented reality influences student learning and inquiry styles: A study of 1-1 physics remote AR tutoring. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2(November 2022), 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100011
Rapanta, C. (2021). Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curriculum? Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103404
Ratinho, E., & Martins, C. (2023). The role of gamified learning strategies in student’s motivation in high school and higher education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19033
Reiling, R. B., Salvanes, K. V., Sandsør, A. M. J., & Strøm, B. (2021). The effect of central government grants on local educational policy. European Journal of Political Economy, 69(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102006
Samuels, W. E., & Onuoha-Jackson, N. (2023). Learning to care: An in-school humane education program improves affective and cognitive empathy among lower-elementary students. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5(May), 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100292
Santos, C., Rybska, E., Klichowski, M., Jankowiak, B., Jaskulska, S., Domingues, N., Carvalho, D., Rocha, T., Paredes, H., Martins, P., & Rocha, J. (2023). Science education through project-based learning: A case study. Procedia Computer Science, 219(2022), 1713–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.465
Sbhatu, D. B. (2021). Challenges of 20th century Ethiopian Science education. Heliyon, 7(6), e07157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07157
Sjølie, E., Strømme, A., & Boks-Vlemmix, J. (2021). Team-skills training and real-time facilitation as a means for developing student teachers’ learning of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103477
Su, Y. (2023). Delving into EFL teachers’ digital literacy and professional identity in the pandemic era: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. Heliyon, 9(6), e16361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16361
Sundgren, M., Jaldemark, J., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2023). Disciplinary differences and emotional presence in communities of inquiry: Teachers’ expressions of digital technology-enabled teaching. Computers and Education Open, 4(August 2022), 100134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100134
Suryaman, M. (2020). Orientasi pengembangan kurikulum merdeka belajar. 13–28. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/semiba/article/view/13357/6512
Utamajaya, J. N., Manullang, S. O., Mursidi, A., Noviandari, H., & BK, M. K. U. (2020). Investigating the teaching models, strategies and technological innovations for classroom learning after school reopening. Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), 13141–13150. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/5063
Valtonen, T., Hoang, N., Sointu, E., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo, K., & Kukkonen, J. (2021). How pre-service teachers perceive their 21st-century skills and dispositions: A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 116(December 2020), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106643
Voinea, M., & Pălăşan, T. (2014). Teachers’ professional identity in the 21st century Romania. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.172
Wang, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2023). Understanding teachers’ online professional learning: A “community of inquiry” perspective on the role of Chinese middle school teachers’ sense of self-efficacy, and online learning achievement. Heliyon, 9(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16932
Wertz, R. E. H. (2022). Learning presence within the Community of Inquiry framework: An alternative measurement survey for a four-factor model. Internet and Higher Education, 52, 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100832
Žalėnienė, I., & Pereira, P. (2021). Higher ducation for sustainability: A global perspective. Geography and Sustainability, 2(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.05.001
Zou, C. Y., Lei, X. X., Hu, J. J., Jiang, Y. L., Li, Q. J., Song, Y. T., Zhang, Q. Y., Li-Ling, J., & Xie, H. Q. (2022). Multi-crosslinking hydrogels with robust bio-adhesion and pro-coagulant activity for first-aid hemostasis and infected wound healing. Bioactive Materials, 16(December 2021), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.034
Zweeris, K., Tigelaar, E. H., & Janssen, F. J. J. M. (2023). Studying curriculum orientations in teachers’ everyday practices: A goal systems approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103969
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Journal of Madako Elementary School agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in the Journal of Madako Elementary School, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the automatic transfer of non-exclusive publishing rights to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
.png)
